ReiserFS vs. ext3

Posted by Jamis on March 29, 2004 @ 02:18 AM

Now, I don’t claim to be an expert on filesystems. That said, this time around I installed reiserfs on my root and home partitions, instead of ext3, at the recommendation of the Gentoo installation documentation.

I have been so impressed.

Whereas emerge sync used to take about 5-10 minutes to run with ext3, it now runs in about a minute. It flies!

I wish I knew more about the strengths and weaknesses of the various filesystems. Right now, it’s easy to say “I’ll never go back to ext3”, but I have to wonder if there is a time and place for it, over reiserfs.

Posted in Odds & Ends

Comments

Have something to add? Click here to leave a comment.

20 Feb 2006

1. sss said...

you are righ man, i also have same exp.

2. sss said...

you are righ man, i also have same exp.
23 May 2006

3. Jake Keller said...

Yah, I find reiserfs WAY ahead of ext3 as well. I only wish I could use reiser4 instead of fs.
21 Mar 2007

4. WonderWorld said...

reiser sucks

http://jeroenraapt.wordpress.com/2007/02/21/reiserfs-vs-ext3/